AliExpress rolls today’s deals
PriceProven
← Back to PriceProven

Our price record. Check it yourself.

Everything this site claims rests on readings we took ourselves, at most one per listing per day: over the last week we read about 22,753 listings a day, roughly 18% of the 127,062 we track, so most listings are read every few days. Those readings are below, and the rows behind our main claim are a file you can download. We would rather you recomputed our figures than believed them.

Price readings
2,175,329
Listings in the record
127,790
Days recorded
79
Busiest day
50,756

127,790 listings appear in the record at least once; 728 of them have since left the catalogue we track, which holds 127,062 today. 2026-08-06 to 2026-10-23. That is 79 calendar days and 79 days of readings — no day is missing.

The claim we are most often asked to prove

Of the 61,081 listings we have now read on 14 or more separate days, 40,459 (66.2%) show a “before discount” price higher than anything we ever recorded for them.

We count a listing as unmatched when the seller’s crossed-out price is more than 1.15× the highest price we ourselves recorded — the margin is there so an ordinary fluctuation is not called a false claim. It says the number cannot be matched against our record. It does not say the seller lied, and we do not know their intent.

Download the rows and check us

One line per listing, with our lowest, highest and average reading beside the seller’s figure. Apply the rule above and you should reach the same count we printed.

Download CSV (61,081 rows)

Readings per day

A price record is only worth what its continuity is worth. Ours starts on 2026-08-06 and cannot be back-dated — a day we did not measure is gone for good, which is why this table is printed rather than summarised.

DayReadings 
2026-08-0616,238
2026-08-0716,459
2026-08-0816,146
2026-08-0919,128
2026-08-1021,012
2026-08-1121,093
2026-08-1219,871
2026-08-1323,813
2026-08-1419,981
2026-08-1522,168
2026-08-1619,224
2026-08-1719,330
2026-08-1820,694
2026-08-1916,568
2026-08-2018,394
2026-08-2119,533
2026-08-2222,336
2026-08-2321,746
2026-08-2420,041
2026-08-2519,667
2026-08-2619,357
2026-08-2720,481
2026-08-2819,721
2026-08-2920,867
2026-08-3022,371
2026-08-3147,849
2026-09-0125,713
2026-09-0236,809
2026-09-0350,327
2026-09-0442,897
2026-09-0537,386
2026-09-0639,767
2026-09-0736,580
2026-09-0827,919
2026-09-0928,393
2026-09-1048,188
2026-09-1150,290
2026-09-1241,412
2026-09-1350,756
2026-09-1445,080
2026-09-1547,894
2026-09-1645,304
2026-09-1747,954
2026-09-1841,297
2026-09-1937,455
2026-09-2040,361
2026-09-2137,488
2026-09-2237,965
2026-09-2343,120
2026-09-2432,913
2026-09-2527,069
2026-09-2624,308
2026-09-2725,209
2026-09-2822,557
2026-09-2920,190
2026-09-3023,126
2026-10-0120,191
2026-10-0221,716
2026-10-0322,041
2026-10-0422,060
2026-10-0524,212
2026-10-0620,604
2026-10-0720,516
2026-10-0823,178
2026-10-0922,476
2026-10-1023,989
2026-10-1123,044
2026-10-1224,005
2026-10-1322,251
2026-10-1423,173
2026-10-1522,534
2026-10-1622,909
2026-10-1723,800
2026-10-1822,142
2026-10-1922,343
2026-10-2022,896
2026-10-2122,322
2026-10-2222,862
2026-10-2320,250

How we measure

We ask AliExpress for the current price of the listings we track on a recurring schedule, and write down what comes back with the date. When AliExpress returns no price for a listing that day, nothing is written rather than something guessed. We never edit a past reading. A listing that leaves the catalogue keeps the readings it already has.

We do not use the seller’s crossed-out price as evidence of anything, because AliExpress does not verify it. It appears in our data only as the claim being tested.

We place today’s price in its range only after 7 separate days of our own readings, and we test a seller’s “was” price only after 14. We do not describe any seller as dishonest. Our record either contains a price or it does not; that is the whole of what we know.

Found a figure that does not reconcile? Every price we have recorded is browsable per listing, and the file above is the same data in bulk. If our numbers are wrong we would rather hear it than keep printing them.